Every year, the government imposes a 22-day nationwide ban on catching, transporting, storing, and selling hilsa during its peak breeding season in October-November, alongside a 58-day ban on all kinds of fishing in marine waters from April to June. These measures, introduced under fisheries conservation laws, are considered crucial for protecting spawning fish and allowing marine stocks to replenish. The 22-day breeding season ban is especially important because it protects brood hilsa during the main spawning period. During this time, mature hilsa migrate from the Bay of Bengal into rivers and estuaries to lay eggs. Preventing their capture ensures successful breeding and increases the future stock of juvenile fish, locally known as Jatka (Under 25 centimeters).

Similarly, the 58-day marine fishing ban plays a wider ecological role by protecting all marine species during critical breeding and growth phases. This period allows shark, whales, dolphins, rays, fish, shrimp, and other marine organisms in the Bay of Bengal to reproduce and mature without fishing pressure, which ultimately contributes to increased catches in subsequent seasons. Experts warn that over-exploitation and uncontrolled fishing pressure are rapidly depleting marine resources in Bangladesh’s coastal waters. The ban period is therefore crucial, as it provides fish and other marine species with the necessary time to breed and replenish their stocks, protect biodiversity, ensuring long-term sustainability of the fisheries sector.

The significance of these bans is particularly profound in the Bangladeshi context, where fisheries remain a major pillar of the economy and a vital source of protein for millions of people. The GDP growth in the fisheries sector is 2.53 % and the contribution of the fisheries sector in the overall agriculture sector is 22.26 % in Fiscal Year 2022-23. To support affected fishermen, the government distribute vulnerable group feeding (VGF) rice. To ease the financial burden on fishing communities during the seasonal bans, the government has announced food assistance measures. Under the programme, each family received 25 kg of rice during the 22-day hilsa ban last year, while the government provided 78 kg of rice to every registered fisherman in the district during the 58-day marine fishing ban. In addition, several NGOs are working with fisher households affected by the ban period through a household-based approach to improve their livelihoods by promoting alternative income-generating activities.

Bangladesh government have warned that anyone violating the seasonal fishing bans may face up to two years of imprisonment, a fine of up to Tk 5 lakh, or both, under Bangladesh’s fisheries conservation laws. The strict penalties are aimed at discouraging illegal fishing and ensuring the protection of breeding fish stocks during critical conservation periods.

Hilsa, the national fish of Bangladesh, is not only a cultural symbol but also a major economic resource that supports the livelihoods of countless fishers, handlers, traders, transport workers, and market stakeholders. According to recent fisheries data from Department of Fisheries, hilsa production has maintained a strong trend over the past five years. Production rose from approximately 5.50 lakh metric tonnes in 2019–20 to 5.71 lakh metric tonnes in 2022–23, demonstrating the success of conservation-driven management. Although the figure slightly declined to 5.29 lakh metric tonnes in 2023–24, experts suggest that the overall trend still reflects significant long-term improvement compared to previous decades. The national fish as a single species has been making the highest contribution (10.55%) to the country’s total fish production. Geographical Indication Registration Certificate has also been achieved for our national fish hilsa named as ‘Bangladesh Ilish’ and also for tiger shrimp named as ‘Bangladesh Tiger Shrimp’. The observed increases in production are largely attributed to seasonal fishing bans, which help prevent overexploitation and ensure sustainable yields. Bangladesh’s total fish production has also shown steady growth, reaching over 50 lakh metric tonnes in 2023–24, indicating the broader positive impact of seasonal open water fisheries conservation policies. In a country where fisheries contribute significantly to nutrition, employment, and export earnings, these bans represent more than temporary restrictions. These bans are strategic investments in sustainable development, biodiversity conservation, and the future resilience of Bangladesh’s blue economy.

Al Shahriar
Fisheries Management Officer
Nature Conservation Management (NACOM)
Email: alshahriar12@gmail.com

The post Seasonal fishing bans: A lifeline for Bangladesh’s Hilsa and marine fisheries appeared first on Seafood Network BD.

Small Indigenous Species (SIS), such as Mola and Dhela, supply essential micro-nutrients, strengthening nutrition and reducing malnutrition (SDG 2 and SDG 3). At the same time, income generated from rural aquaculture improves access to clean water and sanitation (SDG 6), creates employment across production and processing (SDG 8), and reduces poverty and inequality (SDG 1 and SDG 10). Innovative farming systems, including rice-fish and integrated fish-vegetable ponds, support climate action (SDG 13) while conserving aquatic biodiversity (SDG 14) and promoting responsible consumption (SDG 12).

From stabilizing urban fish supplies through rooftop and peri-urban aquaponics (SDG 11) to fostering partnerships among government, private enterprises, and research institutions (SDG 16 and SDG 17), Bangladesh’s aquaculture sector illustrates the potential of a climate-adapted, sustainable, and socially inclusive food system. This story is not just about production; it reflects how a deltaic nation is transforming environmental and socioeconomic challenges into opportunity, offering a blueprint for the Global South on the path toward the 2030 SDGs.

The Economic Anchor: From Ponds to Prosperity

Bangladesh’s aquaculture transformation is remarkable. By 2026, the sector contributes over 3.5% to national GDP and roughly 25.7% to agricultural GDP, supporting the livelihoods of nearly 19 million people, or about 12% of the population.

The country is also moving beyond raw exports toward value-added production. Modern processing facilities in Khulna and Chattogram now comply with stringent EU and US traceability, HACCP standards, allowing Bangladesh to compete in premium international seafood markets.

Innovations such as Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture (IMTA), cultivating shrimp alongside seaweed and mussels, are diversifying income streams while reducing ecological pressure, lowering the risks associated with monoculture dependency.

The “Nature’s Multivitamin” Strategy

While exports fuel economic growth, nutrition remains at the heart of Bangladesh’s aquaculture strategy. Mola and Dhela are exceptionally rich in Vitamin A, iron, zinc, and essential fatty acids, making them critical in combating micro-nutrient deficiencies that remain widespread in rural communities. Unlike larger commercial species, SIS are often consumed whole head, bones, and organs maximizing their nutritional impact, particularly for women and children.

Through carp-SIS polyculture systems, farmers are not only increasing productivity but also reshaping household nutrition. Larger carp generate income in the market, while SIS are retained for family consumption, creating a built-in mechanism for both income security and dietary diversity. This integrated approach directly supports SDG 2 (Zero Hunger) and SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being), with growing evidence linking it to reductions in childhood stunting and hidden hunger in aquaculture-dependent communities.

More than a farming technique, this model represents a paradigm shift in which aquaculture is no longer viewed solely as a source of revenue, but as a public health intervention embedded within food systems. In doing so, Bangladesh is positioning itself at the forefront of nutrition-sensitive aquaculture, offering a scalable and replicable solution for other developing nations facing similar challenges.

Innovation Under Pressure: The Tech-Driven Delta

Climate stress has become a catalyst for innovation across Bangladesh’s aquaculture landscape, driving a shift from traditional practices to data-driven and climate-adaptive systems.

In key production hubs such as Mymensingh and Jessore, “Smart Pond” technologies are redefining farm management. IoT-enabled sensors continuously track critical water quality parameters such as dissolved oxygen, pH, and temperature are translating real-time data into actionable insights delivered directly to farmers’ mobile devices. This precision-based approach not only optimizes feeding and reduces input costs but also minimizes the risk of sudden mass mortality events, a major source of financial loss in aquaculture.

At the same time, Bangladesh’s salinity-affected coastal belt is undergoing a strategic transformation. Through salt-tolerant aquaculture, farmers are diversifying into high-value species such as Artemia (brine shrimp), mud crab, and brackish-water finfish like sea bass (Koral). This shift reflects a broader transition from vulnerability to climate-smart resource utilization, where saline intrusion is no longer a constraint but a productive asset.

Rather than resisting environmental change, Bangladesh is learning to work with it, leveraging technology and ecological adaptation to convert climate pressure into economic opportunity. In doing so, the country is setting a precedent for how aquaculture systems in climate-vulnerable regions can evolve to remain both resilient and profitable.

The Social Fabric: Inclusion Beneath the Surface

Sustainability in Bangladesh’s aquaculture sector is not only ecological or economic; it is fundamentally social. The long-term success of the Blue Revolution is increasingly tied to how equitably its benefits are distributed across communities.

Women are emerging as key actors within the aquaculture value chain, particularly in feed management, hatchery operations, and post-harvest processing. Their participation is not merely supportive; it is reshaping household economies by increasing income stability, improving nutrition, and strengthening decision-making roles within families.

At the same time, Community-Based Aquaculture (CBA) models are opening new pathways for inclusion. By granting landless and marginalized groups access to government-owned water bodies (Khas lands), these initiatives are transforming common resources into shared economic assets. This approach not only creates livelihoods but also fosters local stewardship, accountability, and collective management of aquatic resources.

Together, these inclusive practices ensure that the gains of aquaculture extend beyond commercial producers, embedding resilience at the community level. In this sense, Bangladesh’s aquaculture model is not only productive but also demonstrates how social equity can be integrated into the foundation of sustainable blue growth.

Challenges on the Horizon

Despite its rapid growth, Bangladesh’s aquaculture sector faces a set of interconnected challenges as it moves toward its ambitious 2031 production target of 8.5 million metric tons. Addressing these constraints will be critical for sustaining long-term growth and global competitiveness.

1. Feed Sustainability and Cost Pressure

The sector remains heavily dependent on imported fishmeal and fish oil, exposing farmers to global price volatility and supply disruptions. Developing alternative protein sources such as insect-based feed, algae, and agricultural by-products is essential to reduce costs and improve environmental sustainability.

2. Climate Volatility and Environmental Stress

Rising temperatures, erratic rainfall, salinity intrusion, and increasingly frequent cyclones continue to threaten production systems. Strengthening climate-resilient infrastructure is crucial to minimize losses and ensure continuity.

3. Traceability and Market Compliance

As export markets tighten regulations, particularly in the EU and US, ensuring end-to-end traceability has become a necessity. However, integrating smallholder farmers into digital tracking systems remains a challenge, requiring investment in technology, training, and standardized protocols.

4. Disease Management and Biosecurity

Disease outbreaks, especially in shrimp farming, pose a persistent risk to productivity and export stability. Weak biosecurity practices and limited diagnostic capacity can lead to large-scale losses. Strengthening early warning systems, hatchery standards, and farm-level biosecurity is essential.

5. Access to Finance and Technology

Small-scale farmers often lack access to affordable credit, insurance, and modern technologies. This limits their ability to adopt innovations such as smart aquaculture systems, quality feed, and improved seed. Expanding financial inclusion and extension services is key to scaling sustainable practices.

6. Governance and Institutional Coordination

Fragmented policies, regulatory gaps, and limited coordination among stakeholders can slow progress. Strengthening governance frameworks, public-private partnerships, and research-extension linkages will be critical to ensure coherent sectoral development.

Aquaculture sets Bangladesh apart through its ability to align economic growth with social and environmental priorities. From improving rural livelihoods and nutrition through Small Indigenous Species (SIS) to advancing climate-smart practices and inclusive governance, the sector has evolved into a multi-dimensional development engine. Its experience demonstrates that even under intense climate pressure, vulnerability can be transformed into opportunity through innovation, policy support, and community engagement.

As the world moves closer to the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the lessons emerging from Bangladesh’s delta are clear: the future of aquaculture lies not only in increasing production, but in building systems that are resilient, equitable, and environmentally sound. In this regard, Bangladesh offers a compelling blueprint for the Global South, where water is being reimagined as a foundation for sustainable growth and shared prosperity.

Md. Shofiullah
Student, Department of Oceanography
Noakhali Science and Technology University

The post The Blue Revolution: How Bangladesh is decoding the future of sustainable aquaculture appeared first on Seafood Network BD.

Over the last three decades, shrimp farming in saline and semi-saline ponds has expanded rapidly and become a dominant livelihood strategy in many coastal areas. The coastal region, comprising 19 districts and home to nearly 38 million people, relies heavily on agriculture, aquaculture, and small-scale fisheries. Today, communities on the frontline of climate change are struggling with rising salinity and declining freshwater availability, making the transition toward resilient and well-managed aquaculture more critical than ever for supporting fragile livelihoods.

Salinity intrusion refers to the movement of saline water into freshwater systems such as rivers, soils, and aquifers, causing profound physical and chemical changes. In Bangladesh, this process has accelerated due to natural drivers such as sea-level rise, tidal surges, and reduced dry-season river flows, alongside human-induced pressures including upstream freshwater diversion, poor water governance, unsustainable land-use practices, and inadequate regulation and management of coastal aquaculture systems. During dry seasons, when river discharge is insufficient to repel seawater, the saline front advances further inland, increasing both surface and groundwater salinity.

According to the Soil Resources Development Institute (SRDI), saline-affected land in Bangladesh expanded from 0.83 million hectares in 1973 to over 1.056 million hectares by 2019, an alarming increase that underscores the persistence and severity of the problem. This expanding salinity footprint directly threatens aquaculture systems that depend on stable water quality conditions.

Key Impacts on Aquaculture and Livelihoods
Shrimp aquaculture initially generated high to moderate profits, attracting farmers to convert agricultural land into saline ponds. However, over time, socio-economic benefits have declined due to frequent viral infections, disease outbreaks, poor drainage, and rising soil and water salinity across entire farming landscapes. Erratic rainfall, temperature stress, and increasing siltation of riverbeds have further reduced the suitability of coastal environments for both crops and aquaculture.

As a result, many farmers are now attempting to revert to paddy–aquaculture integrated systems, which are more socially acceptable, environmentally friendly, and better aligned with the delta’s natural ecology. In this climate-stressed region, smallholders increasingly seek resilient livelihood strategies capable of adapting to rapid biophysical and socio-economic changes.

The major impacts of salinity intrusion on aquaculture include:

Reduced Productivity: Elevated salinity levels severely affect freshwater fish species such as carp and tilapia, leading to high mortality rates and reduced overall aquaculture output.

Land Degradation: Unplanned and poorly managed conversion of farmland into saline aquaculture ponds can degrade soil structure, reduce fertility, and increase waterlogging, making land unsuitable for future agricultural use.

Increased Livelihood Risk: Inadequate institutional support and unequal access to resources in brackish water aquaculture systems can exclude marginal farmers, often resulting in land dispossession and loss of income for poorer households.

Disease Vulnerability: Salinity fluctuations weaken the immune systems of aquatic organisms, increasing susceptibility to disease and undermining long-term aquaculture sustainability.

Impacts on Communities and Food Security
The transition toward saline aquaculture systems has also reshaped rural society. Wealthy and influential actors often benefit disproportionately from shrimp farming, while traditional farmers and laborers face declining employment opportunities and widening income inequality.

Salinity-induced scarcity of drinking water, reduced crop production, and loss of grazing land for livestock have intensified health and nutritional challenges. Many households are forced into seasonal or permanent migration in search of alternative livelihoods. Declining availability of freshwater fish, milk, and vegetables has further weakened food and nutrition security in coastal communities.

Although some areas have adopted salinity-tolerant crops and integrated farming systems, the overall trend points toward increasing vulnerability, particularly for landless and smallholder households.

Drivers of Salinity Intrusion
The drivers of salinity intrusion in coastal Bangladesh are both climatic and anthropogenic. Climate change has intensified sea-level rise, altered monsoonal patterns, increased average temperatures, and heightened the frequency and intensity of cyclones and storm surges. These processes contribute to embankment breaches, tidal flooding, land erosion, and widespread saline water inundation.

Human interventions such as reduced upstream river flow due to dam construction, poorly planned embankments, deforestation, weak governance, and inadequate regulation and monitoring of coastal resource use have compounded these impacts. Cyclones such as sidr (2007) and Aila (2009) caused extensive and long-lasting salinization of agricultural lands, freshwater ponds, canals, and rivers, with consequences that persist to this day.

For many farmers, aquaculture remains a vital livelihood strategy, but its sustainability increasingly depends on improved management, governance, and climate-resilient practices.

Professional Management and Adaptation
Despite these challenges, the industry is moving toward modern, resilient technologies. Mismanagement is being replaced by scientifically informed strategies:

Automated Monitoring: Adoption of real-time IoT sensors allows farmers to manage tidal intake and prevent “salinity shocks”.

Advanced Systems: Implementing biofloc and closed-loop recirculating systems (RAS) minimizes the need for external water exchange.

Diversified Models: The “Golda-Paddy-Vegetable” model, using salt-tolerant varieties, stabilizes the farm ecosystem.

Infrastructure: Strengthening polder embankments and improving drainage canals are essential to prevent waterlogging.

By adopting optimal stocking densities and biosecurity measures, aquaculture improves its resilience and sustainability. Addressing salinity contributes to SDG 2 (Zero Hunger), SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), SDG 13 (Climate Action), and SDG 14 (Life Below Water).

The Sundarbans Context: Risk and Opportunity
Aquaculture in the Sundarbans and its surrounding islands is particularly vulnerable to climate change. Cyclones and storm surges frequently inundate fishponds with saline water, causing dyke failure, mass fish mortality, disease outbreaks, water quality deterioration, and escape of stocked species. Farmers often rely on short-term coping mechanisms that offer limited protection.

Long-term resilience requires scientifically informed adaptation strategies that reduce negative impacts while enhancing positive outcomes. As salinization continues, some areas may shift toward regulated brackish water aquaculture systems. However, such transitions must be carefully managed to avoid repeating past mismanagement practices and ensure proper planning, environmental safeguards, social equity, and sustainable seafood production.

Salinity intrusion is a present and escalating challenge for coastal livelihoods. Addressing it requires integrated planning, stronger governance, and climate-resilient aquaculture practices. With decisive action and improved management, Bangladesh can protect its coastal food systems and ensure sustainable seafood production for the future.

Md. Shofiullah
Student, Department of Oceanography
Noakhali Science and Technology University

The post Salinity intrusion in coastal Bangladesh: A silent threat to aquaculture appeared first on Seafood Network BD.

She made these remarks this morning while speaking as the chief guest at the opening session of the 10th Biennial Fisheries Conference, organised by the Bangladesh Fisheries Research Forum (BFRF) at the Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council (BARC) auditorium.

The adviser said that fish is not just food to fill the stomach; it is a very important source of nutrition. Fish provides essential micronutrients, calcium, and other nutrients that help in the development of eyesight, bones, and intelligence. She added that fish-based food habits have played a major role in the intellectual development of the Bengali people.

Speaking about marine fisheries resources, she said Bangladesh has not yet fully used its potential. At present, only about 30 percent of these resources are being used, and even within this limited use, there are many problems. She explained that artisanal trawlers and industrial trawlers follow different fishing methods, and some technologies used by industrial trawlers have created new concerns. She said that going to sea seven times and catching fish only once is not acceptable, just as it is not right to use SONAR (Sound Navigation and Ranging) technology to catch all fish in a single trip.

The fisheries adviser said that it has recently been found that around 70 out of 223 industrial trawlers are using SONAR technology, which has increased the risk of overfishing in the sea. To address these problems, effective policies are urgently needed. She said the government has taken an important step by deciding to update the National Fisheries Policy. Some reforms have already been made to the Fisheries Act, but more changes are needed, which she wants to implement during her tenure. She expressed serious concern about harmful fishing gear, saying that old fishing gear is now being modified in ways that damage the environment and biodiversity. In some cases, fish are even being caught using electric shocks, which is completely unacceptable.

She also said there is discrimination in providing incentives to fishers. Compared to the support given to the agriculture sector, fishers do not receive fair incentives. During fishing ban periods, fishers often do not get the assistance they need, which sometimes forces them to break the rules unwillingly.

The adviser said that hilsa breeding and migration are being severely disrupted due to reduced river depth, pollution, and the combined effects of climate change. She stressed that hilsa is not just a fish but a national asset. Just like dolphin conservation, hilsa protection should be part of a global movement. She added that obstacles in hilsa migration routes have been identified, and requests have been made to the Bangladesh Inland Water Transport Authority (BIWTA) to carry out necessary dredging in coordination with relevant agencies.

At the conference, the keynote paper was presented by Dr Faruk-ul Islam, Country Representative of WorldFish Bangladesh. FAO Representative in Bangladesh (ad-interim) Dr Dia Sanou spoke as an honoured guest. Special guests included Director General of the Department of Fisheries Dr Md Abdur Rouf, Director General of the Bangladesh Fisheries Research Institute Dr Anuradha Bhadra, and Group Adviser of ACI PLC Dr F. H. Ansari.

The session was chaired by BFRF President Dr Joarder Faruk Ahmed. The welcome speech was delivered by Secretary General Dr Md Monirul Islam, and the vote of thanks was given by Vice President Dr Md Khaled Kanak.

The post Increasing fish production has no value without ensuring food safety: Fisheries Adviser appeared first on Seafood Network BD.

Adviser made the remarks while chairing a seminar titled “One Health Program: Opportunities, Challenges and Future Strategies”, organized by the Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock at Hotel Inter Continental on Wednesday afternoon.

The Adviser said presence of senior representatives from the ministries of Health and Family Welfare, Environment, Forest and Climate Change, and Fisheries and Livestock at the same table reflected a real commitment at the policy level. “Today we are not only discussing One Health as a concept, but moving forward together in practice,” she said.

She emphasised that One Health should not remain a topic for speeches alone. “It requires real political commitment, policy alignment, and a willingness to work together. The era of fragmented action is over. What we need now is a whole-of-government and whole-of-nation approach,” she added.

The adviser pointed out that while people suffer from diseases, human actions often create health risks. Unsafe food, environmental pollution, excessive use of antibiotics, and unplanned urbanisation are major contributors to rising health threats. She stressed the need to prioritise prevention and strengthen primary healthcare to address these challenges.

She also highlighted that climate change, zoonotic diseases, food safety, and public health are closely linked. In response, the government has decided to implement the proposed One Health initiative through a single Development Project Proposal (DPP), jointly managed by the three ministries, with three project directors to ensure coordinated implementation across sectors.

Expressing optimism, Farida Akhter said that by considering human health, livestock, fisheries, and the environment together, Bangladesh would be able to implement One Health effectively and set a strong example for other countries.

Speaking as an honoured guest, Adviser for Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Water Resources, and Information and Broadcasting Syeda Rizwana Hasan said development planning must place environmental protection, biodiversity, and public health at its core. She warned that environmental destruction in the name of development ultimately harms society. “We can build roads and infrastructure, but we cannot recreate the Sundarbans or restore a river once it is destroyed,” she said.

She noted that climate change, pandemics, and environmental crises continue to remind us that all elements of nature are deeply interconnected. “Humans are not owners of nature; we are part of it,” she said.

Rizwana Hasan also identified major obstacles to implementing One Health, including excessive procedural complexity, weak coordination among ministries, and delays in decision-making. She called for the formation of effective advisory committees at national and district levels, along with clearly defined focal points in each ministry.

Another honoured guest, Professor Dr Md Sayedur Rahman, Special Assistant to the Chief Adviser at the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, said that human health must remain central to the One Health approach. He explained that the importance of fish, livestock, and environmental health ultimately lies in their impact on human health, food safety, and livelihoods.

Describing the proposed One Health project as an “eye-opening” initiative for Bangladesh, he said it aims to build the capacity to detect health risks early and respond in a timely manner by viewing people, animals, and nature through a single integrated framework.

A joint keynote presentation on One Health was delivered by IEDCR Director Professor Dr Tahmina Shirin, Deputy Chief Conservator of Forests Md Zahidul Kabir, and Director General of the Department of Livestock Services Dr Md Abu Sufian.

The seminar was also attended by Planning Commission Member (Secretary) Dr Kaiyum Ara Begum, Health Services Division Secretary Md Saidur Rahman, Environment Ministry Secretary Dr Farhina Ahmed, and Planning Commission Member (Secretary) for Agriculture, Water Resources and Rural Institutions Dr Md Mostafizur Rahman. Secretary of the Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock Abu Taher Muhammad Jaber delivered the vote of thanks.

The post One Health requires joint commitment of three ministries: Fisheries Adviser appeared first on Seafood Network BD.

As a partner organisation of ANB, Seafood Network Bangladesh (SNB) attended the workshop to cover industry developments and promote sector-wide knowledge sharing. Representatives from FISHBYTE, another ANB partner, were also present and participated actively in the discussions.

Broad Representation Across Government, Academia, and Industry

The event was chaired by Prof. Dr. Md. Monirul Islam (University of Dhaka / BFRF).
Mr. Abu Tahir Muhammed Zaber, Secretary of the Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock, attended as Chief Guest.

Distinguished Special Guests included:

• Dr. Md. Abdur Rouf, Director General, Department of Fisheries
• Rear Admiral Dr. Khandakar Akhter Hossain, Vice-Chancellor, Bangladesh Marine University

The workshop began with a welcome session and an introduction to ANB delivered by Prof. Dr. Md. Lifat Rahi of Khulna University (BSFF).

ANB’s partner organizations represented at the event included Bangladesh Marine University (BMU), Bangladesh Shrimp and Fish Foundation (BSFF), Bangladesh Fisheries Research Forum (BFRF), private sector partner FISHBYTE.

Workshop Sessions and Key Presentations

The workshop aimed to:

• Share findings from recent regional dialogues with shrimp, finfish, hatchery, and smallholder farming communities.
• Facilitate policy-oriented discussions between government, researchers, industry, and field-level actors.
• Identify strategic priorities needed to guide a future National Aquaculture Policy.

Keynote presentations included:

• Dr. Md. Motaleb Hossain – Current status and advancement of Bangladesh’s aquaculture sector
• Prof. Dr. Md. Abdul Wahab – Why Bangladesh needs a National Aquaculture Policy
• Dr. Maria Zaman – Integrating Gender Equality and Social Inclusion (GESI) into aquaculture development

Following the technical session, a panel discussion and an open floor dialogue allowed participants to exchange practical perspectives on industry challenges, governance gaps, and policy opportunities.

Toward a More Sustainable and Inclusive Aquaculture Policy

The workshop concluded with shared expectations to:

• Establish clear and actionable policy priorities for sustainable aquaculture development.
• Strengthen knowledge-sharing mechanisms between government, academia, private sector, and farming communities.
• Enhance stakeholder networking to encourage coordinated sector growth.
• Develop practical, inclusive, and climate-resilient recommendations for the proposed National Aquaculture Policy of Bangladesh.

The post ANB Hosts National Workshop on Advancing Sustainable Aquaculture at Sheraton Dhaka appeared first on Seafood Network BD.

The ban was first imposed after white spot virus was detected in Indian shrmp. This restriction badly hurt exporters—especially in Andhra Pradesh, India’s top shrimp-producing state—forcing them to rely heavily on the US market. When the US later imposed high tariffs on Indian seafood, exporters began talks with Australia to reopen trade.

On the third day of his visit, Lokesh confirmed that Australia had approved the first import of Indian shrimp. “A long-standing hurdle for Indian seafood exporters has been removed,” he said on X (formerly Twitter). “The first import approval for Indian shrimp has been granted.”

Lokesh said the move would boost India’s aquaculture exports and reduce dependence on a single market. He thanked both governments for working together to resolve the issue and support seafood trade.

During his trip, Lokesh met officials from Seafood Industry Australia (SIA), including CEO Veronica Papacosta and engagement manager Jasmine Kelleher. They discussed possible partnerships in seafood processing, quality improvement, and expanding imports from India.

Highlighting Andhra Pradesh’s dominance in seafood exports—accounting for more than 60% of India’s aquaculture output—Lokesh noted that the state exported 16.98 million tons worth $7.4 billion in 2024–25. He called for stronger trade ties, technology exchange, and investment in cold chain and packaging facilities to improve quality and sustainability.

Lokesh also encouraged cooperation on climate resilience and sustainable aquaculture, adding that seafood trade could further strengthen India-Australia economic relations.

Seafood Industry Australia, representing over 30,000 members across fishing, aquaculture, and processing, contributes around AUD 3.5 billion to the Australian economy each year.

The post Australia lifts ban on Indian unpeeled shrimp: Big relief for seafood exporters appeared first on Seafood Network BD.

It’s time to stop asking for sacrifices and start making offers. The paradigm must shift from perpetual philanthropy to smart, market-based investment. This isn’t about commodifying nature; it’s about aligning our financial systems so that a healthy ecosystem becomes the foundation of a thriving local economy. The new bargain is simple: we invest in community-led enterprises that generate revenue from conservation, creating a powerful, self-funding loop of ecological and economic resilience.

This isn’t a theory; it’s a working model already delivering returns for people, planet, and investors. Let’s talk about few.

The Carbon Deal. Coastal communities restore mangrove forests, vital carbon sinks and storm barriers. In return, they sell verified carbon credits. The bargain: investors get high-integrity offsets; the planet gains carbon sequestration, biodiversity, and coastal protection; and communities secure a durable revenue stream.

The Sustainable Food Deal. Impact enterprises are equipping smallholder farmers with regenerative agriculture and climate-smart aquaculture techniques. The bargain: farmers’ yields and incomes rise, their environmental footprint falls, and investors tap into the growing market for sustainable goods, de-risked by improved community resilience.

The Eco-Tourism Deal. Community-owned lodges and guided experiences make wildlife and wilderness more valuable alive than exploited. Tourists get authentic experiences, local people gain pride and income, and investors back a business model where conservation is the core asset, not the collateral damage.

These examples reveal a transformative principle: the structure of finance dictates the behavior it produces. Grants can protect land, but investments build constituencies. They create durable incentives that align local communities, global capital, and the environment. This is how conservation becomes scalable, investable, and resilient beyond donor timelines.

For donors and Development Finance Institutions (DFIs), this is a strategic pivot—not a departure from purpose, but an evolution of method. Their role is to catalyze and de-risk a new asset class: climate-smart, community-based enterprise. Catalytic capital can take the first-loss position, fund technical assistance, and measure success not only in hectares or species but also in livelihoods secured, revenue generated, and tons of CO₂ sequestered.

By prioritizing private sector partners who embed conservation in their business models, whether through regenerative farming, sustainable aquaculture, eco-tourism, or carbon markets, DFIs can unlock a new generation of scalable impact enterprises. These models prove that conservation and commerce can reinforce one another rather than compete for survival.

The private sector, too, must evolve its role, not as a peripheral partner to philanthropy but as the engine of climate resilience. Impact investors, local entrepreneurs, and market facilitators are showing that financial returns and ecological restoration can coexist, provided the incentives are structured correctly. The aim isn’t to monetize nature, but to mobilize capital toward its regeneration.

Philanthropy, meanwhile, has a new and vital role: not to sustain conservation indefinitely, but to prime the pump, absorbing early risk, building proof of concept, and paving the way for private capital. When used strategically, donor funding can shift from being a perpetual subsidy to a catalytic spark that draws in larger, longer-term investment.

The challenge is no longer scientific or moral, it’s financial. We know how to restore mangroves, regenerate soils, and protect coral reefs. What we lack is a financial architecture that rewards these actions as rational economic choices. It’s time to move beyond charity and build a marketplace where protecting the planet is not just virtuous, but valuable.

I urge all of us to rethink what investing in conservation means. Let’s not do it out of guilt or goodwill, but because it’s the smartest investment we can make — in our planet, our economies, and our shared future.

The post From aid to asset: Making conservation a smart bet for people and planet appeared first on Seafood Network BD.

In Ho Chi Minh City, several companies are leading the charge. Phuc Loc Co. Ltd. processes around 60 tonnes of by-products daily to produce 4,000–5,000 tonnes of fishmeal annually, generating revenues of 72–90 billion VND (approximately 3–3.9 million USD). Similarly, Tu Hai Co. Ltd. exports cleaned and dried fish bones to Japan, earning 10–12 billion VND annually.

On the research front, the Southern Research Institute for Marine Fisheries converts mixed crab species into canned crab paste and chitosan powder, a high-value raw material for healthcare and agriculture, sold at up to 1,000 USD per kilogram. Beyond industrial applications, companies like Hai Lan Co. Ltd. transform shells into souvenirs, artwork, and jewelry, reaching global markets through platforms like Alibaba.

Forecasts from the agriculture and environment sector indicate a massive potential for seafood by-products. Shrimp heads alone could provide 490,000 tonnes of food products, pangasius offcuts 100,000 tonnes, and fish oil 150,000 tonnes annually. By 2030, shrimp by-products could reach 650,000 tonnes worth 80–100 million USD, while pangasius by-products could hit 1.3 million tonnes, valued at over 500 million USD.

Officials highlight that converting by-products into resources requires a strategic approach, supported by policies, investment, and collaboration among businesses and scientists. This transformation not only creates tens of thousands of jobs but also reduces environmental pressure from seafood waste.

Currently, Vietnam generates roughly one million tonnes of seafood by-products annually, yet only a fraction is processed, with the sector’s current value at around 275 million USD—far below its billion-dollar potential.

By turning seafood waste into “blue gold,” Vietnam is setting an example of innovation, sustainability, and economic growth in the global seafood industry.

The post Vietnam turns seafood by-products into a billion-dollar Industry appeared first on Seafood Network BD.

Tariffs Upend a Dependable Trade Flow

The U.S. recently imposed a 58% tariff on Indian shrimp including anti-dumping and the extra 25%. For an industry where margins are already thin, the move has made Indian shrimp far less competitive in its top export destination.

As a result, shipments have slowed drastically. Exporters report cancelled or postponed orders, while inventories of frozen shrimp pile up in cold storage. Processing plants, which rely on steady exports to keep their lines running, have scaled back operations.

Farmers’ Plight: Falling Prices, Mounting Debts

Shrimp farmers in Andhra Pradesh and other coastal states are among the hardest hit. With exporters cutting back purchases, farm-gate prices have plunged, making it nearly impossible for farmers to cover the cost of feed, pond maintenance, and loans.

Many have warned they may abandon shrimp cultivation altogether. One farmer told U.S. public radio that the situation is “very, very bad” and might force him to stop farming after his next harvest. For smallholders, the combination of low prices and outstanding bank debts is pushing them into financial distress.

Exporters/Processors: Factories and Markets Under Pressure

Exporters — who are also the processors running India’s shrimp factories — face a different but equally damaging crisis. With U.S. demand drying up, their frozen inventories are swelling. To stay liquid, they have cut the price offered to farmers, which in turn worsens the farmers’ position.

Processing plants have slowed production lines, with reports of workers losing hours or shifts. This is particularly devastating for thousands of women who depend on shrimp peeling and packing jobs to support their families.

The U.S. tariff shock has also disrupted shipping schedules, forcing exporters to renegotiate contracts and absorb losses on already shipped consignments.

Coping Strategies: Diversification and Survival Tactics

Despite the disruption, the industry is trying to adapt:

• Shifting Markets: Exporters are gradually redirecting inventories toward Europe, China, and the Middle East, though competition and strict standards remain obstacles.
• Domestic Push: There are growing calls within India to promote shrimp consumption domestically, positioning it as a healthy protein source and a buffer against export volatility.
• Inventory Management: Exporters are working to slowly reduce their frozen stockpiles, even if that means taking losses in the short term.

Farmers, meanwhile, are experimenting with survival strategies. Some are considering switching to other forms of aquaculture, such as fish, which face less export dependency. Others are seeking collective bargaining through local associations to press for government relief.

Outlook: A Supply Chain Under Strain

The tariff war has exposed how vulnerable India’s shrimp industry is to policy shocks in a single key market. Farmers, processors, and exporters are all entangled in the same struggle — one side cannot survive without the other.

For now, the sector is in damage-control mode: exporters are offloading inventories, farmers are hanging on through a poor season, and policymakers are being urged to step in with support. The real test will be whether India can successfully diversify away from overreliance on the U.S. market, and in the process, build a more resilient shrimp supply chain or successful to make a good deal with Trump administration.

The post Trump’s tariffs disrupt India’s shrimp supply chain: farmers and exporters struggle to stay afloat appeared first on Seafood Network BD.